IWCE is part of the Informa Connect Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Conference: March 8-11, 2027
Exhibits: March 10-11, 2027
North Hall, Las Vegas Convention CenterLas Vegas, NV

2027 Agenda

School Mode: Indoor Location Meets School Safety

John Foley  (Managing Director, Safer Buildings Coalition)
Jason Eyre  (Technology Department Coordinator, Murray City School District)
Roy Want  (Principal Scientist, Google Android)
Tre Zimmerman  (CTO, Rypplzz)
Eric Toenjes  (National Market Manager, Wireless Solutions, Graybar)
Track: In-Building Connectivity & Location Services
Format: Panel Session
Vault Recording: TBD

States and districts nationwide are restricting student cell phones, and most solutions force a choice between classroom focus and emergency communication. At Uvalde, responder radios failed inside the building while students' phones did not. School Mode is a proposed device-level capability, modeled on Airplane Mode, that restricts distracting functions on campus during school hours while preserving 911, emergency alerts, and parent contact.

This session reports on a live pilot at Murray High School in Utah, testing the hardest part of the problem: knowing, with confidence, whether a phone is inside the school. The pilot draws on two location sources together, a device-based location and a network-based spatial intelligence, which uses existing Wi-Fi, private LTE, and carrier RF, and measures the combined result against human ground-truth walk-tests with real devices.

In this discussion, panelists will share Phase 1 results on indoor location accuracy, geofence edge precision, phones powered on inside the zone, and emergency override, along with what the findings mean for indoor location, 911 location, and every building where device behavior should change based on where the device is. This is not a policy debate. It is field data from the RF environment of a working school.

Takeaway

-How device-based and network-based location sources combine to establish position inside a building
-How precisely a geofence can separate inside from outside a building, and where it fails
-Why detecting presence inside a zone matters more than detecting boundary crossings
-How targeted restrictions preserve emergency access that bell-to-bell bans eliminate